Works Cited
"Abortion ProCon.org." ProConorg Headlines. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Dec. 2013.
"Thread: A Moderate View on Abortion Is Completely Irrational." A Moderate View on Abortion Is Completely Irrational. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Dec. 2013.
Works Cited
"HISTORY OF ABORTION." HISTORY OF ABORTION. Feminist.com, 12 Dec. 2010. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. <http://www.feminist.com/resources/ourbodies/abortion.html>.
McBride, Alex. "Landmark Cases." PBS. PBS, Dec. 2006. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. <http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/rights/landmark_roe.html>.
"The Right to an Abortion." The Right to an Abortion. Exploring Constitutional Conflicts, n.d. Web. 20 Jan. 2014. <http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/abortion.htm>.
"Roe v. Wade." LII / Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School, 1 Jan. 2011. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113>.
"ROE v. WADE." Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme Court Media, n.d. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_18>.
Taylor, Dr. Quintard, Jr. "Primary Document: Roe v. Wade." Primary Document: Roe v. Wade. Department of History, n.d. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. <http://faculty.washington.edu/qtaylor/documents_us/roe_v_wade_1973.htm>.
Tushnet, Mark. "The Supreme Court on Abortion: A Survey." Supreme Court on Abortion. No Violence Period., 1986. Web. 20 Jan. 2014. <http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/rauch/nvp/roe/roe2.html>.
Annotated Bibliography
1. Secondary source: Feminist.com
Throughout history abortion has been very dangerous, this source provided information about the debate that was originally brought up. The source looked at women as a whole.
2. Primary source: Roe v. Wade case (Cornell University) Mr. Justice Blackmun
The source provided me information on Justice Blackmun who delivered the opinion of the court.
3. Primary Source: Roe v. Wade case (Cornell University)
It provided the opinions and court arguments that were said. It provided information on how Roe vs. Wade was effective and how it is now affecting the U.S as of today.
4. Primary source: Roe v. Wade (OYEZ)
The source gave me the name of Roe’s attorney for the case; Sarah Weddington. The attorney could not get a good hook for the start of the first argument but her second was strong. "After granting certiorari, the Court heard arguments twice. The first time, Roe's attorney -- Sarah Weddington -- could not locate the constitutional hook of her argument for Justice Potter Stewart. Her opponent -- Jay Floyd -- misfired from the start. Weddington sharpened her constitutional argument in the second round. Her new opponent"
5. Primary source:
James Hubert Hallford "advised her to avoid pregnancy until such time as her condition has materially improved" (although a pregnancy at the present time would not present "a serious risk" to her life) The authors opinion on the topic is not easy to read. The source provides me with the physician that Roe used during the time of the case. The information can compare to other sites because the same physicians name is in other articles.
6. Primary source: Supreme Court on abortion
Ms. Kolbert is the counsel for the ACLU, in Planned Parenthood and said, “Our position is that Roe, in establishing a trimester framework, in establishing strict scrutiny, and in also establishing that the rights of women and the health interests of women always take precedent over the state's interest in potential life.” This source told me that Roe only has interest in the womens potential living not the states potential life.
7. Secondary source: PBS Landmark Cases
The article summarized what happened with the case and how it affected Americans. The source is correct with information because it is found in other sites. The site said, “Roe v. Wade politically divided the nation more than any other recent case and continues to inspire heated debates, politics, and even violence today ("the culture wars").”
8. Secondary source: Exploring Constitutional Conflicts
This source wrote about the amendments that Roe wanted to change. For example they wrote about, “The Court in Roe chose, however, to base its decision on the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the so-called "right of privacy" protected in earlier decisions such as Griswold v Connecticut (striking down a ban on the use, sale, and distribution of contraceptives).” This has been found in other resources.
9. Secondary source: OYEZ Roe v. Wade
This source talked about the legal provisions about the case. The site gave me information that has been found in other sites. It says, “The Court held that a woman's right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy (recognized in Griswold v. Connecticut) protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision gave a woman total autonomy over the pregnancy during the first trimester and defined different levels of state interest for the second and third trimesters. As a result, the laws of 46 states were affected by the Court's ruling.”
10. Secondary source: Feminist.com
This source was very reliable, and it also matched up with my thought about the Roe v. Wade case. It told me that it brought power to the women that they did not have before and it also guaranteed women rights to their own decisions. This is a legitimate source and does not affect and persons bias towards the site because it is all reliable.
“Though Roe v. Wade left a lot of power to doctors and to government, it was an important victory for women. Although the decision did not guarantee that women would be able to get abortions when they wanted to, legalization and the growing consciousness of women's needs brought better, safer abortion services.”
"Abortion ProCon.org." ProConorg Headlines. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Dec. 2013.
"Thread: A Moderate View on Abortion Is Completely Irrational." A Moderate View on Abortion Is Completely Irrational. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Dec. 2013.
Works Cited
"HISTORY OF ABORTION." HISTORY OF ABORTION. Feminist.com, 12 Dec. 2010. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. <http://www.feminist.com/resources/ourbodies/abortion.html>.
McBride, Alex. "Landmark Cases." PBS. PBS, Dec. 2006. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. <http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/rights/landmark_roe.html>.
"The Right to an Abortion." The Right to an Abortion. Exploring Constitutional Conflicts, n.d. Web. 20 Jan. 2014. <http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/abortion.htm>.
"Roe v. Wade." LII / Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School, 1 Jan. 2011. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113>.
"ROE v. WADE." Roe v. Wade. U.S. Supreme Court Media, n.d. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_18>.
Taylor, Dr. Quintard, Jr. "Primary Document: Roe v. Wade." Primary Document: Roe v. Wade. Department of History, n.d. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. <http://faculty.washington.edu/qtaylor/documents_us/roe_v_wade_1973.htm>.
Tushnet, Mark. "The Supreme Court on Abortion: A Survey." Supreme Court on Abortion. No Violence Period., 1986. Web. 20 Jan. 2014. <http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/rauch/nvp/roe/roe2.html>.
Annotated Bibliography
1. Secondary source: Feminist.com
Throughout history abortion has been very dangerous, this source provided information about the debate that was originally brought up. The source looked at women as a whole.
2. Primary source: Roe v. Wade case (Cornell University) Mr. Justice Blackmun
The source provided me information on Justice Blackmun who delivered the opinion of the court.
3. Primary Source: Roe v. Wade case (Cornell University)
It provided the opinions and court arguments that were said. It provided information on how Roe vs. Wade was effective and how it is now affecting the U.S as of today.
4. Primary source: Roe v. Wade (OYEZ)
The source gave me the name of Roe’s attorney for the case; Sarah Weddington. The attorney could not get a good hook for the start of the first argument but her second was strong. "After granting certiorari, the Court heard arguments twice. The first time, Roe's attorney -- Sarah Weddington -- could not locate the constitutional hook of her argument for Justice Potter Stewart. Her opponent -- Jay Floyd -- misfired from the start. Weddington sharpened her constitutional argument in the second round. Her new opponent"
5. Primary source:
James Hubert Hallford "advised her to avoid pregnancy until such time as her condition has materially improved" (although a pregnancy at the present time would not present "a serious risk" to her life) The authors opinion on the topic is not easy to read. The source provides me with the physician that Roe used during the time of the case. The information can compare to other sites because the same physicians name is in other articles.
6. Primary source: Supreme Court on abortion
Ms. Kolbert is the counsel for the ACLU, in Planned Parenthood and said, “Our position is that Roe, in establishing a trimester framework, in establishing strict scrutiny, and in also establishing that the rights of women and the health interests of women always take precedent over the state's interest in potential life.” This source told me that Roe only has interest in the womens potential living not the states potential life.
7. Secondary source: PBS Landmark Cases
The article summarized what happened with the case and how it affected Americans. The source is correct with information because it is found in other sites. The site said, “Roe v. Wade politically divided the nation more than any other recent case and continues to inspire heated debates, politics, and even violence today ("the culture wars").”
8. Secondary source: Exploring Constitutional Conflicts
This source wrote about the amendments that Roe wanted to change. For example they wrote about, “The Court in Roe chose, however, to base its decision on the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the so-called "right of privacy" protected in earlier decisions such as Griswold v Connecticut (striking down a ban on the use, sale, and distribution of contraceptives).” This has been found in other resources.
9. Secondary source: OYEZ Roe v. Wade
This source talked about the legal provisions about the case. The site gave me information that has been found in other sites. It says, “The Court held that a woman's right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy (recognized in Griswold v. Connecticut) protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision gave a woman total autonomy over the pregnancy during the first trimester and defined different levels of state interest for the second and third trimesters. As a result, the laws of 46 states were affected by the Court's ruling.”
10. Secondary source: Feminist.com
This source was very reliable, and it also matched up with my thought about the Roe v. Wade case. It told me that it brought power to the women that they did not have before and it also guaranteed women rights to their own decisions. This is a legitimate source and does not affect and persons bias towards the site because it is all reliable.
“Though Roe v. Wade left a lot of power to doctors and to government, it was an important victory for women. Although the decision did not guarantee that women would be able to get abortions when they wanted to, legalization and the growing consciousness of women's needs brought better, safer abortion services.”